In a Vehicle-to-Vehicle Frontal Crash Prevention 2.0 test conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), the Ford Escape FHEV achieved a “Acceptable” rating - the second highest possible - for its performance in forward collision warning and automatic braking systems, demonstrating its excellent capabilities in preventing collisions. The Nissan Kicks has not been tested.
The Escape FHEV has standard Post Collision Braking, which automatically apply the brakes in the event of a crash to help prevent secondary collisions and prevent further injuries. The Kicks doesn’t offer a post collision braking system: in the event of a collision that triggers the airbags, more collisions are possible without the protection of airbags that may have already deployed.
To provide maximum traction and stability on all roads, All-Wheel Drive is standard on the Escape FHEV. But it costs extra on the Kicks.
Both the Escape FHEV and Kicks have Rear Cross Traffic Alert, but the Escape FHEV has Rear Cross Traffic Braking (automatically applies the brakes) to better prevent a collision when backing near traffic. The Kicks’ Rear Cross Traffic Alert doesn’t automatically brake.
Both the Escape FHEV and the Kicks have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front and rear seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, driver alert monitors and available around view monitors.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Ford Escape FHEV is safer than the Nissan Kicks:
|
|
Escape FHEV |
Kicks |
| OVERALL STARS |
5 Stars |
3 Stars |
|
|
Driver |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
3 Stars |
| HIC |
143 |
476 |
| Neck Injury Risk |
22.5% |
43.8% |
| Neck Stress |
185 lbs. |
476 lbs. |
| Neck Compression |
23 lbs. |
76 lbs. |
|
|
Passenger |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
3 Stars |
| HIC |
102 |
338 |
| Chest Compression |
.5 inches |
.7 inches |
| Neck Injury Risk |
36.3% |
67.5% |
| Neck Stress |
181 lbs. |
253 lbs. |
| Neck Compression |
58 lbs. |
76 lbs. |
| Leg Forces (l/r) |
220/169 lbs. |
234/256 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety does 40 MPH moderate front offset crash tests on new cars. In this updated test, results indicate that the Escape FHEV is much safer than the Kicks:
|
|
Escape FHEV |
Kicks |
| Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
POOR |
| Structure |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
|
Driver Injury Measures |
|
| Head/Neck Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Head Injury Criterion |
122 |
307 |
| Chest Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Thigh/hip Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Leg/foot Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Leg Forces L/R |
382/292 pounds |
405/562 pounds |
| Restraints |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
|
Rear Passenger Injury Measures |
|
| Head/Neck Rating |
GOOD |
MARGINAL |
| Chest Rating |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
| Thigh Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Restraints |
ACCEPTABLE |
POOR |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Ford Escape FHEV is safer than the Nissan Kicks:
|
|
Escape FHEV |
Kicks |
|
|
Front Seat |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
| Hip Force |
240 lbs. |
371 lbs. |
|
|
Rear Seat |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
| HIC |
97 |
206 |
| Spine Acceleration |
43 G’s |
56 G’s |
|
|
Into Pole |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
| Spine Acceleration |
32 G’s |
48 G’s |
| Hip Force |
462 lbs. |
797 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

